Passenger railroads see a sharp jump in ridership as gas prices climb 91%

By Joel Rose0%

5/1/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 867 faulty-reasoning hits from 504 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,049 of 21,172 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON  As the average price of gas climbs above four dollars a gallon, ridership on U.S. passenger railroads is surging, too. 
Amtrak, the national passenger railroad, reported a five percent increase in ridership in March compared with a year ago. 
And Brightline, the privately-owned railroad in Florida, says ridership soared more than 20% for the same month. 
"It usually would be shorter to drive, but the gas prices are high," said Joshua Newman of Washington, D.C., as he waited to board an Amtrak train for the first time in his life at Union Station this week. 
Newman, 20, was on his way to visit friends at a festival in North Carolina. 
"I would rather take the train, instead of having to actually worry about the other prices that come with driving." 
It generally takes a lot to get Americans out of their cars. 
But the average nationwide price of a gallon of gas rose this week to $4.30, the most since the war in Iran began two months ago. 
And for Dorothy English, that is simply too much to pay. 
"It's really ridiculous," said English, who recently drove up the East Coast. 
"Let me tell you, I actually spent $140 to fill up, from Florida to New York. 
I mean, like, every time we went to another state, we were filling it up." 
This week, English decided to take the train from New York to North Carolina instead, with a layover in Washington. 
"I'm not going to pay that much to travel anymore," she said. 
"The train is cheaper. 
So I said, let me take the cheaper way out." 
Amtrak, which is coming off two years of record ridership, says it has seen surges like this before. 
"We typically see some shift to rail as fuel prices rise, and we're seeing that pattern here as well," Amtrak spokesperson Beth Toll said in a statement to NPR. 
"Continued ridership growth underscores the essential role rail plays in connecting communities along the Northeast Corridor and across the nation." 
For Brightline, which has been serving Orlando for less than three years, March's numbers represent a new high-water mark. 
"March '26 was the best month in our history by every measure," said Patrick Goddard, the CEO of Brightline Florida. 
There are probably several reasons for the jump in ridership, Goddard says, including long wait times at airport security checkpoints and lower ticket prices. 
But Goddard says the cost of gas is part of the mix, too. 
"I think gas prices were a factor for the Miami-Orlando trip," Goddard said in an interview. 
"You know, when guests do the math of gas, tolls and then parking  if they're going to Orlando, they're parking at a theme park for anywhere from two to five days  Brightline typically wins." 
It's too early to say whether Amtrak and Brightline can retain these passengers when gas prices drop again. 
But that doesn't appear likely to happen anytime soon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.1%Joel Rose: 4.8%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 2.3%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Joel Rose: 8.7%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 9.5%Joel Rose: 1.4%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic9.5%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 2.7%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Joel Rose: 4.8%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias6.5%This article: 6.7%Joel Rose: 12.1%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 8.3%Joel Rose: 1.9%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion8.3%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.9%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Joel Rose: 8.0%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias4.0%This article: 5.4%Joel Rose: 3.5%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias5.4%This article: 4.6%Joel Rose: 17.6%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 8.6%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 1.4%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.2%Joel Rose: 0.8%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 1.3%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 1.2%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Joel Rose: 3.2%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%Joel Rose: 3.6%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.3%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.2%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.3%Joel Rose: 14.8%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority13.3%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 2.4%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 1.8%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.1%Joel Rose: 7.2%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization7.1%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.6%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.4%Joel Rose: 5.2%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion2.4%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.7%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.1%Joel Rose: 5.0%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.1%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.0%Joel Rose: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division4.0%This article: 28.2%Joel Rose: 8.3%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal28.2%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.8%Joel Rose: 0.5%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.8%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 1.1%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.7%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.7%Joel Rose: 0.8%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote7.7%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 1.2%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.7%Joel Rose: 0.6%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 4.0%Joel Rose: 0.4%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination4.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.0%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joel Rose: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Joel Rose: 0.8%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.5%

504 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers77%attributed speech118writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageAmtrak • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBrightline • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJoshua Newman • 39 words • 100.0% coverageJoshua Newman • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJoshua Newman • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDorothy English • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDorothy English • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDorothy English • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDorothy English • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDorothy English • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDorothy English • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDorothy English • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDorothy English • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAmtrak • 18 words • 0.0% coverageBeth Toll • 29 words • 0.0% coverageBeth Toll • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Goddard • 20 words • 100.0% coveragePatrick Goddard • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Goddard • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Goddard • 16 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick Goddard • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Beth Toll

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words13% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Indoctrination+40.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Beth Toll: 40.8%40.8%Biased Writer Voice-28.8 ptsWriter: 28.8%Beth Toll: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.