Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Tankersley results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 1,296 hits . Analysis detected 4,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,393 of 6,628 authors). This Jim Tankersley is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Jim Tankersley
Author details
Total words: 3,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.0% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.3% 19.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 32.5% 32.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 32.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst