Author summary
94%1 analyzed article/video157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Leatherman results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 981 faulty-reasoning hits from 628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of 98% (266 of 9,027 authors). This Jim Leatherman is worse (more manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
Jim Leatherman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
98%Jim Leatherman (selected)13%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 628
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510097.1% percentile
12.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles628 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 23.9%23.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 24.2%24.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.2%14.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 16.1%16.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.0%10.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 8.0%8.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 24.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 14.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 12.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos