Author summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 2,536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Dobson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 2,292 hits . Analysis detected 7,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,368 of 6,357 authors). This Jim Dobson is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Jim Dobson
Author details
Total words: 7,608
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 30.1% 30.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 30.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst