Author summary
52%1 analyzed article/video1,131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessica Brockington results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 442 hits. Analysis detected 2,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,564 of 8,966 authors). This Jessica Brockington is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Jessica Brockington
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
38%Jessica Brockington (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,524
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos