Author summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerry Hildenbrand results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 1,043 hits . Analysis detected 7,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,027 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 88% (838 of 6,628 authors). This Jerry Hildenbrand is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Jerry Hildenbrand
Author details
Total words: 3,027
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.4% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 28.9% 28.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.4% 25.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 34.5% 34.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 14.7% 14.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 12.0% 12.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.8% 22.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 34.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 28.9%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.8%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 14.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 12.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst