Author summary
10% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Meehan results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 267 hits . Analysis detected 933 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,514 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,235 of 8,876 authors). This Jeffrey Meehan is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Jeffrey Meehan
Author details
Total words: 3,514
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst