Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jeff Sanders results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 73 hits . Analysis detected 362 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,037 authors). This Jeff Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jeff Sanders
Author details
Total words: 1,552
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 4.7% 4.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst