Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeff Mason results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 609 hits. Analysis detected 3,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,444 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (715 of 6,420 authors). This Jeff Mason is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Jeff Mason
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
89%Jeff Mason (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,444
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
6.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 42.2%42.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 16.8%16.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 11.0%11.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.6%11.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 42.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 13.8%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate