Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jay K. Varma M.D. results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 425 hits . Analysis detected 2,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This Jay K. Varma M.D. is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jay K. Varma M.D.
Author details
Total words: 3,132
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 13.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.3%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst