Author summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Carbone results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Negativity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 12 hits. Analysis detected 12 faulty-reasoning hits from 204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (896 of 9,392 authors). This James Carbone is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
James Carbone
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠91%James Carbone (selected)6%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 204
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles204 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos