Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JACK DURA results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (2,992 of 6,382 authors). This JACK DURA is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
JACK DURA
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠54%JACK DURA (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos