Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Burke results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 799 hits. Analysis detected 4,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (1,055 of 6,628 authors). This Jack Burke is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Jack Burke
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠85%Jack Burke (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,680
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.1% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 29.8%29.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 29.3%29.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 10.6%10.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.3%2.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 29.3%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos