Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isobel Koshiw results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 586 hits . Analysis detected 3,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (953 of 6,204 authors). This Isobel Koshiw is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Isobel Koshiw
Author details
Total words: 2,236
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.7% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 26.2% 26.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.1% 21.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.2% 8.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 26.2%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst