Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isaac Arnsdorf results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 358 hits . Analysis detected 2,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,212 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,636 of 6,630 authors). This Isaac Arnsdorf is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Isaac Arnsdorf
Author details
Total words: 2,212
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.3% percentile 4.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.4% 11.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst