Author summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 1,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irene S. Levine results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 1,243 hits . Analysis detected 4,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,455 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,906 of 6,628 authors). This Irene S. Levine is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Irene S. Levine
Author details
Total words: 4,455
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 27.9% 27.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 19.5% 19.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 27.9%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 19.5%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst