Author summary
1%1 analyzed article/video861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hugh Johnson results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 469 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (8,060 of 8,870 authors). This Hugh Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Hugh Johnson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
10%Hugh Johnson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,444
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751009.1% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.9%0.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.6%0.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos