Author summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 432 hits . Analysis detected 3,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,146 of 8,795 authors). This Heather is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Heather
Author details
Total words: 2,168
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.0% percentile 4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.9% 19.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.3% 18.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 10.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Red Herring: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst