Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harry Khachatrian results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 1,439 hits . Analysis detected 7,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,389 of 6,628 authors). This Harry Khachatrian is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Harry Khachatrian
Author details
Total words: 5,844
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.6% 24.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.9% 14.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst