Author summary
57%2 analyzed articles/videos667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Lea results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 1,254 hits. Analysis detected 2,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,293 of 6,629 authors). This Greg Lea is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Greg Lea
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
51%Greg Lea (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,048
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 31.0%31.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 31.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos