There's a simple way to watch Argentina vs Switzerland for *FREE* ⁠23%

By Greg Lea⁠57%

7/12/2026, 12:15:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 690 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (17,049 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the article peer group.

Lionel Messi's Argentina face Switzerland in a do-or-die 2026 FIFA World Cup quarter-final clash at Kansas City's Arrowhead Stadium on July 11. 
Hungry for goals? 
Here's a simple way to watch Argentina vs Switzerland for free – in the U.S., Canada and beyond. 
Kick-off is at 9 p.m. 
ET / 6 p.m. 
PT / 2 a.m. 
BST (July 12) , with fans around the world tuning in to see whether Argentina can reach the semi-finals in North America. 
Argentina vs Switzerland: Free stream, TV channel 
Free stream: ITVX (U.K.) 
Watch from anywhere: Norton VPN (Up to 63% Off) 
Messi will lead out Argentina for this World Cup quarter-final, although Lionel Scaloni could make changes to other parts of his team. 
Nicolas Otamendi, Facundo Medina and Thiago Almada are all pushing for a start. 
Johan Manzambi, one of the breakout stars of the tournament, will undergo a late fitness test to see if he can start in a side captained by Granit Xhaka. 
If you're searching for how to watch Argentina vs Switzerland free online, we've got everything a 'soccer' fan needs, including kick-off times, TV channels, and where to find a live stream of every goal, header and mesmerising Messi free-kick. 
Read on as we show you how to watch Argentina vs Switzerland from anywhere in the world for free with Norton VPN . 
Watch Argentina vs Switzerland live streams for free 
In the U.K., Argentina vs Switzerland will be broadcast for free on ITVX . 
The build-up is live from 1.15 a.m. ahead of kick-off at 2 a.m. 
BST. 
Get ITVX – no messy sign up, email and a UK postcode (e.g. 
HA9 0WS). 
TV licence holders only. 
Traveling abroad? 
Use Norton VPN to watch ITVX as if you were back home in the U.K.. 
How to watch Argentina vs Switzerland live streams from anywhere 
🏆 Tom's Guide No.1 Streaming VPN – Try 60 days 🏆 
We recently crowned Norton VPN our No.1 Streaming VPN . 
Blazingly fast. 
Secure. 
Works on phones, laptops and smart TVs. 
So you can stream World Cup coverage from anywhere, on any device. 
✅ 60-day money-back guarantee 
🔓 Unlocks global streams 
⚽ Quick! 
Up to 63% off Norton VPN plans 
Catch every World Cup goal live with Norton VPN! 
View Deal 
Quick guide: watch World Cup for free 
Using a VPN is incredibly simple. 
1. 
Install the VPN of your choice . 
As we've said, Norton VPN is our No.1 streaming VPN. 
2. 
Choose the location. 
For instance if you're in the U.S. and want to watch Argentina vs Switzerland free, you'd select 'United Kingdom' from the list. 
3. 
Watch the World Cup. 
Head to ITVX and watch the game live. 
What devices is ITVX available on? 
Amazon Fire (Tablets, Cube, Stick, TVs) 
Android TV (please note: some models aren’t supported) 
Android (Mobile & Tablet) - Android 7.0 and above 
Apple TV (tvOS 14 or later) 
Google TV (Chromecast with Google TV and NVIDIA Shield) 
Freely 
Freesat (please note: some models aren’t supported) 
Freeview Play (TVs and set-top boxes) (please note: some models aren’t supported) 
iOS (iPhone & iPad) - iOS 14 and above 
LG Smart TVs (2016-2024) 
NOW Smart Sticks and Boxes (minimum firmware v11.5.0) 
PlayStation (PS4 and PS5) 
Roku (Stick & Roku-OS powered TVs, minimum firmware v11.5.0) 
Samsung Smart TVs (2017 and above - 2016 models only offer on demand TV) 
Sky Q, Sky Glass and Sky Stream puck 
Virgin Media (360, Stream, TiVo) 
YouView (BT, Humax, Sony, TalkTalk) 
Xbox (One, Series X, Series S) 
More from Tom's Guide 
How to watch World Cup 2026 online 
How to watch Peacock from anywhere with a VPN 
How to watch the World Cup in 4K 
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. 
For example:1. 
Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. 
Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. 
Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.5%Greg Lea: 1.2%Tomsguide: 2.9%Confirmation Bias6.5%This article: 1.4%Greg Lea: 0.4%Tomsguide: 1.5%Anchoring Bias1.4%This article: 1.0%Greg Lea: 1.1%Tomsguide: 3.1%Availability Heuristic1.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 1.1%Tomsguide: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.7%Tomsguide: 3.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Greg Lea: 4.4%Tomsguide: 4.6%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 4.8%Greg Lea: 0.5%Tomsguide: 1.6%Loss Aversion4.8%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.0%Greg Lea: 2.3%Tomsguide: 4.9%Optimism Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Greg Lea: 0.3%Tomsguide: 4.0%Negativity Bias3.5%This article: 7.5%Greg Lea: 0.6%Tomsguide: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.4%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Greg Lea: 3.3%Tomsguide: 5.3%Halo Effect10.3%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.6%Tomsguide: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.5%Greg Lea: 3.0%Tomsguide: 3.8%Appeal to Authority4.5%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.3%Tomsguide: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.5%Tomsguide: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.6%Greg Lea: 2.0%Tomsguide: 5.2%Hasty Generalization2.6%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.2%Greg Lea: 0.3%Tomsguide: 0.9%Bandwagon3.2%This article: 6.7%Greg Lea: 2.6%Tomsguide: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion6.7%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.2%Tomsguide: 1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 3.5%Greg Lea: 0.6%Tomsguide: 0.2%Tu Quoque3.5%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 2.3%Tomsguide: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.6%Tomsguide: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.7%Tomsguide: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.7%Greg Lea: 1.1%Tomsguide: 2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.7%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 7.0%Greg Lea: 0.4%Tomsguide: 0.2%Special Pleading7.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.4%Greg Lea: 4.3%Tomsguide: 12.4%Biased Writer Voice11.4%This article: 9.9%Greg Lea: 6.8%Tomsguide: 4.2%Indoctrination9.9%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Lea: 0.0%Tomsguide: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 29.0%Greg Lea: 31.0%Tomsguide: 14.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…29.0%

690 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.0%attributed speech676writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageFuture Publishing • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Future Publishing

0%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words100% of attributed speech58% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -29.6 ptsWriter: 29.6%Future Publishing: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%Future Publishing: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-10.1 ptsWriter: 10.1%Future Publishing: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.