Author summary
3% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Mamon results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 304 hits . Analysis detected 2,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,780 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (8,711 of 8,785 authors). This Grace Mamon is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Grace Mamon
Author details
Total words: 13,780
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 0.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.5% No True Scotsman: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst