Author summary
22%1 analyzed article/video799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GENE JOHNSON Associated Press results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 984 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,172 of 8,782 authors). This GENE JOHNSON Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
GENE JOHNSON Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
19%GENE JOHNSON Associated Press (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,196
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos