Author summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fred Harrison results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 902 hits . Analysis detected 5,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (2,366 of 8,942 authors). This Fred Harrison is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. Fred Harrison
Author details
Total words: 4,028
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 22.4% 22.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 15.0% 15.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 22.4%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst