Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frank Griffiths results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 584 hits . Analysis detected 5,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,113 of 6,334 authors). This Frank Griffiths is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Frank Griffiths
Author details
Total words: 7,564
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst