Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Koop results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 1,072 hits . Analysis detected 10,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,324 of 6,248 authors). This David Koop is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. David Koop
Author details
Total words: 15,616
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst