Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francis Kapper results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 903 hits . Analysis detected 9,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,920 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,635 of 6,628 authors). This Francis Kapper is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Francis Kapper
Author details
Total words: 8,920
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst