Author summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 1,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These For the Frontier results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 411 hits . Analysis detected 1,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,617 of 8,958 authors). This For the Frontier is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. For the Frontier
Author details
Total words: 4,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst