Author summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 2,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Felix Pope results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,111 hits . Analysis detected 6,828 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,165 of 6,476 authors). This Felix Pope is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Felix Pope
Author details
Total words: 9,432
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst