Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Faith Miller results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,291 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Faith Miller is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Faith Miller
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Faith Miller (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,940
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.0%14.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.2%7.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos