Author summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan W. Houk results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 229 hits . Analysis detected 1,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,483 of 8,828 authors). This Evan W. Houk is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Evan W. Houk
Author details
Total words: 1,940
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst