Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esme Gordon-Craig results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 1,319 hits. Analysis detected 8,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,408 of 9,098 authors). This Esme Gordon-Craig is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Esme Gordon-Craig
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
85%Esme Gordon-Craig (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,556
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 23.7%23.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.0%13.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 13.8%13.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Author 23.7%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 16.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 13.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos