Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esme Gordon-Craig results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 1,319 hits . Analysis detected 8,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,408 of 9,098 authors). This Esme Gordon-Craig is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Esme Gordon-Craig
Author details
Total words: 5,556
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 23.7% 23.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 16.8% 16.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 13.8% 13.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Author 23.7%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 16.8%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.6% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst