Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Hale results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 2,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,595 of 6,217 authors). This Erin Hale is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Erin Hale
Author details
Total words: 3,332
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst