Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emily Guarnotta PsyD results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 328 hits . Analysis detected 2,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Emily Guarnotta PsyD is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Emily Guarnotta PsyD
Author details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 11.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst