Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emily Fagan results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 121 hits . Analysis detected 967 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Emily Fagan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Emily Fagan
Author details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst