CBC News49%

Artifacts of Victoria's past discovered by crews in sealed compartment beneath street 5%

By Emily Fagan0%

6/6/2026, 5:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 874 faulty-reasoning hits from 688 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,984 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the article peer group.

It's the scenic view of the harbour or the eternal search for a space to park downtown that brings most people to the quiet concrete lot between Wharf Street and the ocean in Victoria, B.C. 
But the old stone wall tucked underneath Wharf Street is one of the oldest pieces of the city's colonial past  it contains some forgotten artifacts recently unearthed by a restoration crew. 
When built in 1859, the wall made up the lower storeys of the Hudson's Bay warehouse, a central point of where goods flowed in between the dockyards and Fort Victoria. 
Liam Hall, co-owner of Heritage Masonry and Conservation, is part of the team hired by the City of Victoria to reinforce and restore the wall. 
Part of that work included opening a doorway outlined in yellow bricks, which Hall said had once been an entrance to the building before it was sealed off in the 1960s, to strengthen support holding the street above. 
"Once we opened it up, we weren't really sure what was going to be inside," he said. 
"So we removed bricks and [got] a head inside with a flashlight and [took] a peek into this sort of weird chamber that hadn't seen sunlight in a long time." 
Quite a bit of what the team found was garbage  construction rubble and debris, along with cigarette packs, pop cans, and broken glass. 
But amid the rubble were decorative stone rosettes from the original Turner Beeton warehouse, which stood besides the Hudson's Bay site before it too was demolished, except for a wall that remains along the harbour. 
Hall's team re-sealed two of the rosettes back inside the chamber with a time capsule. 
Alongside the rosettes, he included some money, a copy of the Times Colonist newspaper, photos and plans of their work on the wall, and a photo of all the people from the city and crews who were part of the project. 
"It's pretty cool because the world of heritage conservation is ensuring that past stories can be told in a tangible way," said Hall. 
"To be able to physically interact with something that was built by somebody, people who've been dead for 100 years, is like a really cool part of it and so by putting in a time capsule it basically leaves our mark on it, which is the layers of history." 
Decades earlier, before the small subterranean chamber was sealed off, it caught the interest of local historian John Adams when he moved to Victoria as an 11-year-old. 
He and some friends decided to explore, hoping they might find a secret tunnel. 
"One day we came down on our bikes, deliberately with flashlights, we boosted each other up, and we thought that we would end up in a secret tunnel that would lead to Bastion Square, or maybe to Chinatown, who knows," said Adams. 
"Anyway, we were very disappointed because it only went just a short distance under the sidewalk." 
Originally, Adams said the warehouse was 4.5 storeys. 
Ships could unload directly into the lower harbour side, with an elevated street-level entrance on Wharf Street. 
Most of the stone used to build it was local, he said, though the yellow bricks outlining the doorway come from England. 
"It was the biggest building on the colony of Vancouver Island for many, many years," he said. 
In the 1930s, when Hudson's Bay no longer needed the space, they offered it to the province. 
The warehouse was torn down, with only a lone wall left standing. 
Adams came to watch some of the restoration work, and is grateful the city made efforts to preserve the wall and save the rosettes found inside. 
"Most people just see it as a wall and have no idea why it's there, but it really should be preserved," he said. 
"As a historian, it's rewarding that people do cherish that stuff because we all know that not everybody does." 
Hall says he plans to donate the rosettes, except for the ones kept in the time capsule, to the Victoria city archives. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Emily Fagan: 1.9%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic7.6%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Emily Fagan: 1.5%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%Emily Fagan: 2.3%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias9.2%This article: 2.3%Emily Fagan: 0.6%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias2.3%This article: 14.1%Emily Fagan: 4.4%CBC: 5.7%Negativity Bias14.1%This article: 6.5%Emily Fagan: 1.6%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Emily Fagan: 0.8%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Emily Fagan: 0.8%CBC: 3.6%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Emily Fagan: 1.0%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.0%Emily Fagan: 2.5%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority10.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 7.1%Emily Fagan: 1.8%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning7.1%This article: 13.7%Emily Fagan: 4.3%CBC: 4.8%Hasty Generalization13.7%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.3%Emily Fagan: 1.7%CBC: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion3.3%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.5%Emily Fagan: 0.6%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.8%Emily Fagan: 2.7%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.8%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.8%Emily Fagan: 3.2%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice12.8%This article: 10.5%Emily Fagan: 3.5%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination10.5%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Fagan: 0.0%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

688 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers34%attributed speech452writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageLiam Hall • 17 words • 0.0% coverageLiam Hall • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageLiam Hall • 23 words • 100.0% coverageLiam Hall • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Adams • 42 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Adams • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Adams • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Adams • 23 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Adams • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Liam Hall

86%flagged-word coverage
119 attributed words50% of attributed speech51% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice+36.8 ptsWriter: 7.7%Liam Hall: 44.5%44.5%Indoctrination+41.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Liam Hall: 41.2%41.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.