Author summary
5% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellis Juhlin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 319 hits . Analysis detected 1,623 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,430 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,619 of 8,776 authors). This Ellis Juhlin is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Ellis Juhlin
Author details
Total words: 7,430
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 0.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.0% 0.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst