Author summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elliott Abrams results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 284 hits . Analysis detected 1,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (742 of 6,498 authors). This Elliott Abrams is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Elliott Abrams
Author details
Total words: 916
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.6% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles916 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.0% 31.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.3% 16.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.0% 10.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 9.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Author 8.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst