Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellen Schmidt results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 787 hits . Analysis detected 2,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,379 of 6,517 authors). This Ellen Schmidt is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Ellen Schmidt
Author details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 23.1% 23.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.8% 14.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst