Author summary
70%1 analyzed article/video750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Brown results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 2,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,765 of 8,437 authors). This Elizabeth Brown is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Brown
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
80%Elizabeth Brown (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,000
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.6%7.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.8%15.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 4.1%4.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos