Author summary
21%1 analyzed article/video840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eastern Europe correspondent results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 1,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,398 of 8,559 authors). This Eastern Europe correspondent is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Eastern Europe correspondent
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
26%Eastern Europe correspondent (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,360
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510025.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos