Author summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dylan Goforth results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 1,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (7,182 of 8,965 authors). This Dylan Goforth is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Dylan Goforth
Author details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst