Author summary
55% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deborah Grigsby results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 343 hits . Analysis detected 3,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,656 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,133 of 9,028 authors). This Deborah Grigsby is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Deborah Grigsby
Author details
Total words: 5,656
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst