Author summary
â 49% 1 analyzed article/video 2,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David A. Plymyer results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,444 hits . Analysis detected 6,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of â 64% (3,286 of 8,944 authors). This David A. Plymyer is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. David A. Plymyer
Author details
Total words: 8,460
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.1% 17.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.4% 14.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst