Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Venton results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 688 hits . Analysis detected 5,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,578 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,469 of 6,134 authors). This Danielle Venton is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Danielle Venton
Author details
Total words: 3,578
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.3% 16.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 19.2% 19.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst