KQED60%

Bay Area Brewery Pulls CO2 From the Air to Keep Beer Flowing 20%

By Danielle Venton0%

3/26/2026, 5:32:04 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 655 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,035 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (16,526 of 20,452 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the article peer group.

Over a sun-baked weekend this month, customers lined up for beer, their numbers overflowing into the palm-treed, and mercifully shaded, garden of Almanac Beer Co. in Alameda. 
Cold lagers and ales in pint glasses bubbled and sparkled, the fizz courtesy of dissolved carbon dioxide. 
The CO2 gives the beer extra flavor, aroma and a tingly, crisp feeling on the tongue. 
Customers sampling the beer would have no idea the amber liquid in their hand was in any way trailblazing, but they were drinking what’s believed to be the first beer carbonated with CO2 caught by a direct air capture machine at the brewery. 
We may often think of carbon dioxide as a waste product that contributes to climate change  something released during combustion, with far too much of it accumulating in the atmosphere. 
Beyond being an atmospheric pollutant, carbon dioxide is also an industrial commodity, a material used to produce concrete and fertilizer and for carbonating beverages like beer. 
Sarah McGrath tends the bar at Almanac Adventureland and Brewery in Alameda on March 20, 2026. 
(Martin do Nascimento/KQED) 
In California, it is often a byproduct of refining oil or gas. 
Then it is shipped on trucks to wherever it is needed. 
The supply chain is fragile and unreliable, forcing businesses that rely on it to halt operations from time to time. 
Berkeley-based Aircapture is changing that by capturing and concentrating CO2 at the site where its customers need it. 
Over the weekend, the company unveiled its system at Almanac’s Alameda brewery. 
The beer company has used it in its operations for about a month. 
“We aim to save our customers money and provide them with a higher reliability of supply, higher purity supply, and of course, a much more sustainable supply,” said Matt Atwood, founder and CEO at Aircapture. 
Matt Atwood, CEO at Aircapture, and the Aircapture system installed Almanac Adventureland and Brewery in Alameda on March 20, 2026. 
(Martin do Nascimento/KQED) 
From a climate perspective, this application isn’t necessarily a game changer, said carbon sequestration expert Klaus Lackner. 
He founded the Center for Negative Carbon Emissions at Arizona State University and is not involved in Aircapture or Almanac. 
While it’s avoiding the need to industrially produce and ship CO2 on trucks, fundamentally, it’s capturing carbon that is then released into the beer and eventually out into the atmosphere. 
But, he said, if niche markets like breweries adopt direct air capture, that could provide the breeding grounds for the technology to be further developed to the point that the price for it drops dramatically.“ 
It’s actually critical that if you want technologies which can replace what we have,” Lackner said, “whether this is air capture or something else, that you get affordable.” 
Solar panels, he said, used to cost hundreds of times more than they do today and only started meaningfully contributing to renewable energy supplies once their cost came down. 
“Fundamentally, this was a business decision,” said Damian Fagan, CEO of Almanac. 
His company saves 15% on the per-pound cost of CO2. 
That adds up pretty quickly, Fagan said, in the range of tens of thousands of dollars a year. 
The additional sustainability is great, he said, and fits in with the company’s goals of locally sourcing ingredients. 
But his primary interest was avoiding future disruptions in supply. 
For that, he would even be willing to pay more per pound. 
Almanac shut down operations for two days last fall when shipments of CO2 didn’t arrive from their suppliers. 
They couldn’t can beer, so they couldn’t sell it. 
Their brewing schedule backed up. 
To catch up, they had to add a third shift and staff worked till midnight. 
The CO2 industry infrastructure  part of the heavily regulated oil and gas industry  is aging and degrading, so Fagan expects reliability will only get worse. 
“The writing’s on the wall: the infrastructure that produces CO2, particularly here in California, is fading quickly,” he said. 
“And CO2 is literally intrinsic to the brewing process  it’s like electricity or water. 
If you don’t have them, we are just dead in the water. 
We can’t operate without it.” 
The Aircapture system at Almanac Adventureland and Brewery in Alameda on March 20, 2026. 
(Martin do Nascimento/KQED) 
Almanac promotes its use of the Aircapture technology through branding on its “Flow” beer, a light and bright West Coast Pale Ale. 
Eventually, they plan to use it in all their beers and to power their lines that push the beer to the 30 taps in the taproom. 
While carbonation improves the aroma and taste of the beer, customers won’t notice a difference between the industrially-provided CO2 and the locally-sourced CO2 from the parking lot. 
There’s no effect on taste, and Aircapture said the purity from their technology significantly exceeds industry standards. 
The direct air capture machine sits in the brewery’s parking lot. 
A large fan sucks air through a pipe. 
A ceramic substrate grabs onto the carbon dioxide in the air. 
Brenden Dobel prepares fermenter tanks for brewing beer at Almanac Adventureland and Brewery in Alameda on March 20, 2026. 
(Martin do Nascimento/KQED) 
The CO2 is then released via a blast of steam and piped into the brewery and a trailer with Aircapture’s equipment. 
The CO2 is cooled down, concentrated, turned into liquid, purified and sent to tanks. 
Almanac pays for the carbon dioxide it uses, but not directly for the equipment. 
The machine is designed to last 20 years. 
If Almanac expands and needs more CO2, it can add additional units. 
This year, the brewery expects to use around 120,000 pounds to brew 15 thousand barrels of beer  and that number is rising. 
Damian Fagan, CEO at Almanac Beer Co., at Almanac Adventureland and Brewery in Alameda on March 20, 2026. 
(Martin do Nascimento/KQED) 
“Our usage is only going up,” Fagan said. 
Almanac is, to the best of Aircapture’s knowledge, the first brewery to use direct air capture technology to carbonate its beer. 
But it almost certainly won’t be the last. 
The company’s next project is with Anheuser-Busch InBev, the world’s largest brewer, installing the technology at a brewery in the Canary Islands later this year. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 7.7%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Danielle Venton: 2.3%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic1.7%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 3.7%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 1.2%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 2.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Danielle Venton: 16.3%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect1.2%This article: 3.3%Danielle Venton: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion3.3%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.5%Danielle Venton: 7.7%CalMatters: 3.6%Optimism Bias14.5%This article: 6.4%Danielle Venton: 3.8%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 3.0%Danielle Venton: 7.0%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias3.0%This article: 6.8%Danielle Venton: 2.0%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Danielle Venton: 12.0%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 2.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 1.2%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 3.5%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 4.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 3.9%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.8%Danielle Venton: 8.4%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization2.8%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.4%Danielle Venton: 1.6%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon2.4%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 19.2%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 1.8%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 3.8%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.7%Danielle Venton: 3.0%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal1.7%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 1.8%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 1.2%CalMatters: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.2%Danielle Venton: 11.3%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice4.2%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 4.8%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Venton: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.3%Danielle Venton: 6.8%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.3%

1035 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers27%attributed speech754writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Atwood • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKlaus Lackner • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKlaus Lackner • 30 words • 0.0% coverageKlaus Lackner • 35 words • 0.0% coverageKlaus Lackner • 28 words • 0.0% coverageKlaus Lackner • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDamian Fagan • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDamian Fagan • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDamian Fagan • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDamian Fagan • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDamian Fagan • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDamian Fagan • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDamian Fagan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDamian Fagan • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Matt Atwood

100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words12% of attributed speech44% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +86.3 ptsWriter: 13.7%Matt Atwood: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Matt Atwood: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.