Author summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Goodrich results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 18 faulty-reasoning hits from 212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (1,496 of 8,982 authors). This Daniel Goodrich is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Daniel Goodrich
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Tabitha Mueller1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠84%Daniel Goodrich (selected)5%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 212
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles212 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos