Author summary
14% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Gaddy results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 467 hits . Analysis detected 1,700 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,372 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (6,660 of 8,876 authors). This Daniel Gaddy is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group. Daniel Gaddy
Author details
Total words: 4,372
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.7% 10.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst