Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Avery results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anchoring Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 1,603 hits . Analysis detected 3,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,700 of 6,628 authors). This Dan Avery is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Dan Avery
Author details
Total words: 6,504
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 24.6% 24.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 24.6%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Tu Quoque: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst