Author summary
12%2 analyzed articles/videos10,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Current Affairs results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 1,761 hits. Analysis detected 15,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,456 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,896 of 9,077 authors). This Current Affairs is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Current Affairs
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
2%Current Affairs (selected)1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 41,456
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
0.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles41.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos